5 SIMPLE TECHNIQUES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS CASE LAW

5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law

5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing from the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and implement Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It really is essential for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to prevent likely offenders and ensure justice to the victims and their families.

Life imprisonment is definitely an alternative to your death penalty. In this kind of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life powering bars.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In case the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.

Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property including tax on once-a-year rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be just one or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for your decision on the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all might be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted within an argument.

The Court thought of the case being maintainable under Article 184 (3) Considering that the Risk and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more

When a lot of websites offer free case legislation, not all are equally reliable. It’s essential To judge the credibility with the source before counting on the information.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution from the convicted person like a consequence of their crime.

Regardless of its popularity, hardly any may concentrate on its intricacies. This article is undoubtedly an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section and the exceptionally reduced threshold that governs it.

104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly recognized now that the provision latest case laws for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service structure but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if content that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province within the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them to get fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page